Wednesday, March 24, 2010
I have been
talking to my good friend Lydia, a member of my church, she’s been a member for
a year, seems like longer than that, has had a tragedy in her family, but a warning
to men and women, stay away from abusive relationships. Not good for you, so
that’s one good thing that comes out of it and we’re continuing to hold Lydia
and her family up in prayer dealing with this situation.
Going to the
phone lines now and take your calls.
My
comment is for yesterday on the medium and you wanted to know where in the
bible it said that they would be put to death. Leviticus 20:27 (caller reads
passage).
27 A man also or woman that
hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they
shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.
Pastor Moss: You’re right. In fact the thing
that’s interesting about it is that in I Chronicles 10:13 (pastor reads
passage).
13 So
Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD, even
against the word of the LORD, which he kept not, and also for asking counsel of
one that had a familiar spirit, to enquire of it;
So that’s
why he died, God forbade it in the law; he knew it and he violated Gods command
anyway. You’re right, that was our
challenge and I’m going to be giving a summation of that on today’s program.
We’ve
just about left it alone. We came to the conclusion that according to your
faith let it be done unto you, so those that want to believe that they can lose
it you go ahead, and those who that you now have it and its with you then it be
good unto you too. The question now is, we got a question about John 10:10
10 The
thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that
they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
where
it says the thief comes to kill, steal and destroy. The later part of that
where it says: I came to give you life and to give it more abundantly. Is he
talking about, some kind of believe this is materialistic, and some of us
believe it more has to do with the spiritual aspect of an abundant life.
Pastor Moss: I would agree with those who
believe that it has more to do with the spiritual abundance than dealing with
the physical aspect of it. In fact when he talks about life there the word bios
is not used which is biological life the word Zoë is used which really is the
Greek word for spiritual life and so that’s what he was talking about us having
more abundantly, not material things and prosperity but spiritual life; in fact
everlasting life, that’s the real focus of Jesus’ ministry. If so that if we
believe in him as it say in John 5:24 and verses following, we’ve already
passed from death unto life. So eternal life is what he was all about.
24
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him
that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but
is passed from death unto life. 25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and
now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that
hear shall live. 26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to
the Son to have life in himself;
Not that you
can’t get blessed here in this realm, but Jesus Christ did not die on the cross
or come here for us to be rich.
It
seems like the majority of them think that of the natural materialistic world
that’s what he meant by abundant life. The rest of us we’re more so agreeing
with what you just said.
Pastor Moss: Let me comment on that and give you
a little more ammunition for that. If it were so that he came to give us, this
was physical prosperity that he was talking about, then if that were the case
then every Christian who had faith and was a believer in Christ should be rich,
wealthy, free of pain, plenty of money. But, however that is not what it said
in Hebrews 11.
1 Now
faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
When we look
there it gives us both aspects of faith. It gives us 1 where there were people
who were delivered, delivered from the jaws of lions, delivered from the fire,
from everything. But, there were other folks who had faith and look at how they
lived. Says in verse 35-37 (read passage).
35 Women
received their dead raised to life again: and others were tortured, not
accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection: 36 And
others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of bonds and
imprisonment: 37 They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were
slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being
destitute, afflicted, tormented;
Now tell
your friends what about these wondering around in sheep skins and their
Christians if we’re supposed to have life more abundantly and what it means is
just physical blessings. In fact it says; in goat skins being destitute
afflicted and tormented, then verse 39 says: and all these having obtained a
good report.
39 And
these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the
promise:
So all of
them were faithful, but just because you have faith does not mean you’re going
to be materially well off. And wasn’t it
Paul who said, that he knew how to be full and hungry. So the bible is pretty
clear that Jesus is not talking there in that sense about, the focus isn’t on
material well being.
Right.
One other question in Matthew 20:16 where it says many are called but few are
chosen. What did he mean by chosen?
16 So the last shall be first, and the first
last: for many be called, but few chosen.
Pastor Moss:
I would say this, that the call goes out to everyone, everyone is called
but only a few are chosen. The ones who are not chosen are those who hear the
call and reject it. They heard the call, they were called, but they’re not
chosen by God because they don’t accept him. They don’t receive the call that
was given.
Ok,
you remember the thing about Paul where God told Ananias that he was a chosen
vessel unto him; well this is the debate here now, in some cases it looks like
you don’t have a choice. Kind of like, I guess you would say they were using
Jonah as an analogy. The way everything just worked its way out, really Jonah did
not have a choice but to do what he did. Like he was chosen to go to Nineveh
even though he tried to go the other way God knew that he was going to go so in
this situation with Paul the chosen then there was no way that he could have,
like he was predestinated from the very beginning in the mind of God to do what
he was going to do.
Pastor Moss: Well what happens is I would differ
with those who say Jonah didn’t have a choice. He had a choice. He could have
stayed in the whale or he could have confessed what he said and went to
Nineveh. In other words, let’s put it this way, God did give him a lot of
motivation but he still had a choice. Paul had a choice too. Even though he was
knocked on the ground, he still could have got up and blasphemed God, just as people
did in the book of Revelation during the tribulation period after all of the
judgments came upon them. So no, God does give choice, in fact people are told
to believe, John 12:36 Jesus said while you have light believe in the light,
that you might be the children of light.
36 While ye have light,
believe in the light, that ye may be the children of light. These things spake
Jesus, and departed, and did hide himself from them.
Conversely, if
you don’t believe in the light you won’t be one of the children of light. So
you’re to believe.
I’m
agreeing with what you’re saying. But there’s that one scripture where he says,
you did not choose me, but I chose you. It goes to say that you really didn’t
have a choice, that’s the way they looking at that.
Pastor Moss: They can look at it that way but
they ignore the balance of the evidence. Over in John 15:16 Jesus does say, you
have not chosen me but I have chosen you.
16 Ye have not chosen
me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth
fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the
Father in my name, he may give it you.
But that
doesn’t mean that they didn’t choose him, all he’s saying is that ultimately
none of us would make it unless we were chose by Jesus, or chose by God. But
the same token still we make a choice. We have to receive him, so both are true
and both are true without being contradictory. God being sovereign of course he
determines everything that happens. But problem here we just don’t know how he
does that, but he says we have to believe and we have to make the choice. John
1:12 As many as received him to them gave he power to become the children of
God.
12 But as many as
received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them
that believe on his name:
In fact God
chastises people for not believing. So regardless of what anybody says, yes God
chooses us but we also choose him as well.
I
have a scripture in I Corinthians 6:11 I believe this is a key scripture; there
are churches all over the area and they have faith in Jesus and they believe in
the Lord but they’re teaching different things. And I believe whoever has this
understanding of this scripture in the correct and right way has the real plan
of salvation. I just like to see what you say about it.
Pastor Moss:
Where it says in I Corinthians 6:11 (reads passage).
11 And such were some
of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the
name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
Yeah, I
think that’s good stuff. I think right
there we see some of the big terms of salvation.
Ok,
that term washed, does that mean saved?
Pastor Moss:
Basically I would say yes cause you’re washed by the Holy Spirit. The
word in Greek here is loosed, that the
salvation is provided by Jesus Christ looses us from our sins, just as water
looses you from dirt.
Did
this take place all at the same time or is this progressively or, it seems like
there are different portions in there?
Pastor Moss: It’s talking about some different
things. Says and such were some of you, but you were washed. Now that has to
start everything, in other words you have to be born again by the word of God.
In other words there’s no process…. You have to be born again. Then it says but
you are sanctified; now sanctified has 2 aspects as well. The minute you become
saved, instantaneously you are set apart by God, but at the same time you have
to give evidence of that sanctification. You’ve got to walk in a position that
God has placed you in. Then justified; what that means of course is a forensic
term, a legal term that means you are justified by God, you’re saved because of
Jesus Christ. It’s as if you never sinned. So it’s not saying you’re washed
first, sanctified first, and justified first; all of these happen at the same
time. There is progressive sanctification however.
Then
it says in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ Spirit of God, what does that part
mean?
Pastor Moss:
The one who does it all, that’s just telling you who the person is who
washes you, who sanctifies you and who justifies you. Salvation is only found
in Jesus Christ; in Jesus Christ and in him alone.
I
didn’t hear when you first came on about the trivia from yesterday.
Pastor Moss:
Well the answer to the question is that no, we are forbidden to
communicate with the dead. It’s very clear; a number of passages, one over in
Isaiah , a number of them have been given, Leviticus, Deuteronomy 18 which
comes against it, I Chronicles 10 and also there’s a passage in Isaiah 8:20
which lets us know this is something that we should not do. In fact what the
bible is telling us is it’s not something that we should even be seeking, is to
communicate with the dead. It’s in Isaiah 8:19-20 (read passage).
19 And
when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and
unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their
God? for the living to the dead?20 To the law and to the testimony: if they
speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
Basically
what he’s saying is you’re not supposed to be trying to communicate with the
dead at all. If you want any super natural information you should be seeking
God for it. That’s basically exactly what he’s saying. And then at verse 20 it
points us to the key source, (read passage), so we’re supposed to go to the
word of God, we’re supposed to go to God, but not to mediums and not to try to
communicate with the dead for information.
I
have a question in regards to divorce and remarriage. I don’t know what chapter
it’s in: a friend of mine, actually a co-worker, she was divorced, her and her
husband were both Christians when they got married, he divorced and married
someone else, and this person he is currently married to, he has children with
this new woman and it’s been like 15 years ago. She stated that God does not
recognize his second marriage because they were both Christians when they were
married and he committed adultery on her and divorced and married the other
woman; and that her ex-husband is supposed to divorce his current wife and
remain single for the rest of his life. I say well what about the kids, that
would leave the kids without a father so why would you combine it with a second
sin? Was my question to her. But, my question to you is, I do believe that of
course, he committed adultery so he probably shouldn’t have remarried, even
though he has, I would assume that God would consider that if he repented for
that, wouldn’t his marriage now still be legitimate, because she stated it’s
not cause God never recognize it just like he wouldn’t recognize homosexuals,
therefore this is not a recognizable
marriage and he is not repented as long as he stays married, so he is, she
doesn’t believe in eternal security by the way, so he eventually is going to
hell anyway according to her.
Pastor Moss:
First of all a lot of assumptions are made by her, they could be true
assumptions or false, that’s why it’s hard to give a firm hard answer to this.
First of all she said when they first got married they both were Christians,
well how do she know that he was? She can’t look inside of his heart and know
for sure that he was. Now I know that she wouldn’t marry him unless she at
least thought he was cause then you’ll be violating II Corinthians 6:14 which
says do not be unequally yoked believer with unbeliever, but could be that he
wasn’t saved in the first place. In fact, for him to up and commit adultery and
then to leave her like he did and not repent of the adultery and at least try
to restore the relationship doesn’t bowl well for him really being a Christian,
so that’s first off. On the same hand I
do agree with her, I don’t think that God is going to approve of you committing
adultery with a woman, committing adultery against your wife, then marrying the
other woman that you were committing fornication with. So, the bottom line is
just leave that up to God. I don’t think that, it doesn’t seem to me to be right,
or correct either in terms of what he’s doing. But, all he can do is,
definitely like you said, for the sake of those children, he’s got to be the
man he has to be. So he’s got to still carry on what he does in the family. But, I wouldn’t be the one to say that God is
blessing that relationship, I would say this that God is interested in making
sure that the Kids don’t suffer from a relationship like that. And I tell you
what, in my ministry experience I’ve never seen, and maybe it’s because it’s limited,
but I haven’t seen it work too well when you have situations like that for the
people who married and it was a marriage based upon fornication.
So
say that person, the ex-husband for example, can he, going on the assumption
that he was a believer and he shouldn’t have done that, cause believers still
can sin, so I’m assuming that he was a believer, is that a sin that he can’t
repent for and stay married to his current wife?, so, I don’t understand that.
Pastor Moss:
I’m not telling anyone what God would do, but I know that all I can say
is that’s something that would be between him and God. It’s kind of rough, but
definitely if a person is truly, truly repentant, then I believe that God is
going to forgive anyone, God will forgive them and guide them. You know it’s
like real hard to look at a situation like this, you would have thought that if
he was going to repent it should have been repenting and not continuing that
adulterous relationship, breaking that off right away. So, that’s a hard
question to answer, so the only thing you can do is leave that between him and
God.
Ok
well thank you so much Pastor Moss.
My
question to you sir, a two-fold question: one is in regard to those who preach
and teach another gospel, I have a buddy who’s a oneness apostolic
pentecostalist, who doesn’t believe in the trinity, in fact he said that the
scripture which says in Matthew 12:19 the formula for baptizing in the name of
Jesus only, that was not originally in the bible.
Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Ghost:
By
him denying the trinity is he denying the express image of Christ Jesus as well
as the trinity?
Pastor Moss:
Yeah I would say so, but the thing is, I met people who do it, there’s 2
categories, some folks who do it totally ignorantly, they don’t know what
they’re doing.
Oh
this one knows.
Pastor Moss:
Now I tell you what, he doesn’t know, if he says that Matthew 28:19 was
not originally in the bible, he knows little. A person, all he’d have to do is
study textual criticism and look at the history of the translation, he’s got to
prove that by actually looking at the documents and the documents are clear.
There wasn’t a time when that was added in and where it was not, so he’s
ignorant of that, there’s something that he doesn’t know. And usually things of
this nature are based upon, or in other words a lot of times the reason why a
person really doesn’t believe in the doctrine of the trinity, they don’t
understand it or they have to deny pieces of information that would lead them
to it. Because, what he’s admitting by what he says is that, that scripture
does give evidence for the trinity, that’s why it’s got to be denied. But a
typical argument that’s used by people in Islam or anyone who doesn’t like what
the bible says, it’s not in the manuscripts, it wasn’t there.
Just
like in Galatians, I think it was Galatians 5:7 where it speaks of three
bearing witness of him.
1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record
in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
Pastor Moss:
That’s I John 5:7. Which we admit, now that one we know, we know that
that was not in some of the earlier manuscripts, that didn’t, Erastus put that
in because someone found a manuscript that was 16th century, and we
admit that see, and that’s what I mean, there is a difference between when you
say that something isn’t in the original manuscripts you must have studied
that, you just can’t come up with that, and that’s what folks don’t realize. In
fact, I’ve often challenged people, let’s sit down, bring your information,
I’ll bring mine to the table, you show me where this was missing and where it
got put in, cause that’s the work of scholarship. So, but you’re right about I John 5:7, the
only thing is I John 5:7 is not the only verse that talks about the doctrine of
the trinity. There are verses all through the bible, no doctrine, no doctrine
of systematic theology is based just on one verse. That is what a lot of
people, even a guy by the name of Dr. Ehrman thinks, who wrote the book
Misquoting Jesus, he’s using that one verse as an example and says well if this
verse is gone the trinity falls. No, that’s not so.
Second
question is, I was talking to my sister and she was telling me that, we were
discussing capital punishment, and she said being a believer she doesn’t
believe in capital punishment and she said show me in scripture does Jesus ever
kill anyone, does he ever mention killing anyone? I said no he never flew a
helicopter either, but it doesn’t mean he doesn’t believe in capital
punishment.
Pastor Moss: She said that Jesus never killed
anyone huh? (Yep). Does she maintain that when Jesus comes back he doesn’t kill
anyone?
No
she said he never killed anyone in the scriptures, not on his return, but in
the scriptures that we read now. To say that meant that she did not believe
that he believed in capital punishment. Almost like the red letter Christian.
Pastor Moss:
Your argument was a good argument about him being in a helicopter, kind
of thing, but the fact is definitely she can’t maintain that for him when he
comes back because in Revelations 19:15 It shows that he comes back (read
passage),
15 And out of his mouth
goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall
rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness
and wrath of Almighty God.
then over in Revelations 20 it talks about him
languishing people on the earth with his mouth. He comes back after the 1000
year reign, there is one more and let me read it here Revelations 20:9 (read
passage),
9 And they went up on
the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved
city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
now if
that’s not capital punishment I don’t know what is. Now what she might say to
that is well God is the one who can do that. Yes God can and also God can
commission others to do that. So her argument that Jesus did not do it is a
fragile one because actually if God commands capital punishment for murder
that’s what we see in Genesis 9 and we don’t see anywhere where God says don’t
so it except in the case of the adulterous woman over in the gospel of John.
Her argument doesn’t wash.
One
more question convince a person that abortion is mentioned in the bible. Not
the word itself, another sister believes that since she don’t see abortion in
the bible that means it’s ok.
Pastor Moss:
It’s amazing that people will say that they are going to continue to
smoke marijuana until they see in the bible thou shall not smoke weed. The
principles in the bible are very clear, it doesn’t have to match every single
word that you have. Of course abortion is mentioned in the bible, it’s
described, it doesn’t have the exact word, but that shows you that naiveté, and
I have to say this, where people are not educated, where they’re arguing well
the word has to be there, if I don’t find weed in there I’m going to keep
smoking weed, If I don’t find lucky strikes I’m going to keep smoking, you
know. Exodus 21 is what she needs where it says and show how God wants to
protect the young, in verse 22 and if men strive and hurt a woman with child so
that her fruit depart from her and yet no mischief follow he shall be surely
punished.
22 If men strive, and
hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief
follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay
upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
So, and this
is mentioned other places in the bible as well. That’s all you need to show her
brother, you got it too.
Pastor Moss: This is Pastor Moss here in the last
segment of our program trying to give this summation concerning what we talked
about yesterday and that is biblically
should we try to talk or communicate with the dead? And the answer is no, we’ve
seen that, for a number of reasons, first of all, God forbids it, it gets you
off into dealing with the occult and sorcery and witchcraft, which of course
God forbids as well in a number of passages of scripture in the old testament,
we have some in the new as well, Leviticus 18, 20,
20: 27 A
man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall
surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be
upon them.
over in Acts
19
13 Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon
them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the LORD Jesus,
saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth. 14 And there were seven
sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so. 15 And the
evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye?
16 And the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, and overcame them,
and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and
wounded.
and here in Luke 16 it seems to be pretty,
pretty clear where it says concerning this life and the afterlife, where
remember Lazarus and the rich man, Lazarus goes into Abraham’s bosom which is a
Hebrew idiom for heaven we believe and the rich man winds up in hades, now
after the rich man gets into hades, he turns into Billy Graham, he wants to be
an Evangelist, while he’s in hell and he wants some things done. In fact, what
he asks for is that Lazarus would return from the dead, go back and preach to
his brothers who are still left. But, there’s something that is said here in
Luke 16:26 which is very telling, where it says, and besides all this between
us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that they which would pass from
hence to you cannot neither can they pass to us that would come from thence.
So, in other words there’s a gulf fixed, the dead is separated from the living
by let us say super natural barriers. People don’t just come back from the dead
they don’t do it. God of course for his purposes can allow anything to happen,
he’s always sovereign, but definitely we don’t see in the bible where people
are communicating with their dead loved ones. Alright, you just don’t see it.
The reason you don’t see it is cause it doesn’t happen except in the single
case that we talked about.
16: 19 There was a certain
rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously
every day: 20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at
his gate, full of sores, 21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell
from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 And
it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into
Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; 23 And in hell he lift
up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his
bosom. 24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send
Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue;
for I am tormented in this flame. 25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou
in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things:
but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26 And beside all this,
between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass
from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from
thence. 27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send
him to my father's house: 28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto
them, lest they also come into this place of torment. 29 Abraham saith unto
him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30 And he said, Nay,
father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31
And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will
they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.